Regulation
Validate this RSS feedRSS Feed
U.S. Politicians Take Differing Views on High-Frequency Trading (Sept. 1, 2010)
Several members of the U.S. Congress engaged in further debate during the month of August over the role of high-frequency trading in the U.S. equity markets. Two Democratic members of the Senate called for greater regulation of high-frequency trading, while two Republican members of the House came out in defense of this type of trading activity.

On Aug. 5, Senator Ted Kaufman, a Democrat from Delaware, submitted a list of nine regulatory recommendations to the Securities and Exchange Commission to address what he called “serious flaws” in the structure of the U.S. equity markets. Kaufman specifically urged the SEC to create an “effective regulatory regime” for high-frequency traders. This should include finalizing its large trader tagging and consolidated audit trail proposals, requiring high-frequency traders to certify that their algorithms do not manipulate market prices, issuing guidance on the types of trading patterns that would constitute unlawful manipulation, and imposing “liquidity provision obligations” on high frequency traders.

On Aug. 11, Senator Charles Schumer, a Democrat from New York, wrote a letter to SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro urging the agency to impose market maker obligations on high-frequency traders. Schumer outlined several specific conditions for such obligations, but noted that the SEC also should consider “appropriate incentives for high-frequency traders to become market makers given the cost of these obligations.

On Aug. 24, Representatives Spencer Bachus, a Republican from Alabama, and Jeb Hensarling, a Republican from Texas, sent a joint letter to Schapiro protesting the “ad-hoc” nature of SEC rule-makings in this area and urging the agency to rely on “economic and empirical market data, not political pressure,” in determining how to respond to changes in market structure. The two lawmakers, who sit on the House Financial Services Committee, asked Schapiro to provide the SEC’s analysis of the costs and benefits of several proposed rules and urged the agency to consider the potential impact on liquidity providers.
Click Here for Kaufman Letter
Click Here for Schumer Letter
Click Here for Bachus and Hensarling Letter

CFTC and SEC Hold First Meeting of Joint Advisory Committee (May 24, 2010)
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission held the first meeting of the newly formed joint advisory committee on emerging regulatory issues on May 24. The committee, which consists of eight former government officials and industry leaders as well as several prominent academics, spent most of the meeting listening to a presentation by CFTC and SEC officials on the extreme market movements that took place on May 6. While the staff have not identified the exact causes of the turmoil, the presentation indicated that they are focusing on several inter-related factors, including a wave of selling in the stock index futures markets, the lack of coordination among stock trading venues, uncertainty about trade cancellation policies, delays in market data, the use of “stub quotes” in the equity markets, and a sudden withdrawal of liquidity by market makers.

CFTC staff concentrated on activity in stock index futures. Both volume and volatility in the CME’s E-mini S&P 500 futures were much higher than normal on May 6. Volume that day was 2.6 times above the average level and the fifth highest in five years, according to the CFTC staff presentation. The price range that day was 112.75 points, the second highest range in five years. Between 2:30 and 3:00 p.m., the short window of time in which the market turmoil was at its peak, volume in the E-mini contract was 10 times the average level.

During that half-hour period on May 6, bid-offer spreads widened and market depth decreased notably on the buy-side of the order book, the CFTC staff said. Although bid-offer spreads quickly returned to normal levels after CME triggered its stop logic functionality at 2:45 p.m., the depth of the market—as measured by the number of bids and offers five-deep in the order book—was much lower than before.

The CME’s stop logic functionality is designed to stop a cascade of stop loss orders from causing an excessive downward spike in prices. When the stop logic is triggered, the market goes into a five-second pause that allows new orders to be submitted to the exchange and matched against the stop loss orders that are awaiting execution. CME officials have explained that this functionality brings additional liquidity into the market and permits the market to regain its equilibrium.

Click Here for Staff Presentation on May 6 Findings
Click Here for Joint Meeting Webcast

CFTC and SEC Form Joint Committee to Examine Market Turmoil and Other Emerging Regulatory Issues (May 11, 2010)
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Mary Schapiro have formed a joint committee that will address emerging regulatory issues, starting with a review of the market turmoil on May 6. The two agencies said the joint committee will make recommendations related to market structure issues that may have contributed to the volatility on that day as well as disparate trading conventions and rules across various markets.  The joint committee will consist of market practitioners, academics and former regulators, including two former CFTC Chairmen—Brooksley Born and Susan Phillips—as well as former SEC Chairman David Ruder and Nobel prize-winning economist Robert Engle.  

Click Here for Joint Announcement

CFTC Issues Statement on Intraday Position Limits (May 7, 2010)
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission on May 7, 2010 issued an advisory reminding market participants of their obligations to comply with speculative position limits on an intraday basis, rather than only on an end-of-day basis. “A trader whose position exceeds the applicable speculative position limit at any time during the day is in violation of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations, even if the position is subsequently reduced to a level within the applicable limit by the close of the market for that day,” the CFTC said. “Accordingly, intraday speculative position limit violations have been and continue to be subject to Commission enforcement action as violations of the Act.”

Click here for the statement

Comment Letter Filed by Getco in Response to SEC Concept Release (April 27)
Joint Comment Letter Filed by Allston, Hudson River, QuantLab and RGM in Response to SEC Concept Release (April 23)
SEC Proposes Large Trader Reporting System (April 14, 2010)
SEC Proposes New Measures to Protect Investors in Options Markets (April 14, 2010)
SEC Approves Short Selling Restrictions (Feb. 24, 2010)
SEC Issues Concept Release Seeking Comment on Structure of Equity Markets (Jan. 13, 2010)
SEC Proposes New Rule to Effectively Prohibit Unfiltered Access and Maintain Market Access Controls (Jan. 13, 2010)